Mini-Cam MINI REEL vs Rausch minCord: a simple small-pipe camera comparison.
If you need a compact camera for small pipes and awkward access, compare the Mini-Cam MINI REEL with Rausch minCord 5 and minCord XL.

Mini-Cam MINI REEL vs Rausch minCord: side by side
| Feature | Mini-Cam MINI REEL | Rausch minCord |
|---|---|---|
| Published minimum pipe size | From 32 mm | From 15 mm |
| Camera head | 30 mm axial camera | minCord 5: 13 mm axial camera; minCord XL: 13 / 18 mm options |
| Push cable | 30 m mini coiler | minCord 5: 15 m; minCord XL: 30 m |
| Locating | Depends on selected MINI REEL configuration | 33 kHz / 512 Hz / 640 Hz locating sonde |
| Display / recording | SOLO PRO+ control/reporting workflow | 5 in display on minCord 5; 7 in on minCord XL; image/video capture through the Rausch Viewer workflow |
Where Rausch has the advantage
- Much smaller access: minCord starts at 15 mm.
- Smaller camera head: 13 mm on minCord 5/XL.
- Choice of compact formats: 15 m minCord 5 or 30 m minCord XL.
- Multi-frequency locating: 33 kHz, 512 Hz and 640 Hz are published on minCord.
Which should you choose?
If your work is mainly conventional small-diameter drainage inspection and you value the Mini-Cam reporting ecosystem, MINI REEL is a credible option. If access into genuinely tiny pipes, cavities or difficult spaces is the priority, Rausch minCord is the stronger choice.
See Rausch minCord 5 → See minCord XL →
Sources: Rausch International minCord 5, minCord XL and Mini-Cam MINI REEL manufacturer information, checked August 2026. Exact capability depends on configuration. Mini-Cam and MINI REEL trademarks belong to their respective owners.