iPEK Verisight Ultra vs Rausch mC: the simple push-camera comparison.
For Rausch, compare Verisight Ultra with mC50/Duo, mC80 and mC360 depending on the job.

iPEK Verisight Ultra vs Rausch mC: side by side
| Feature | iPEK Verisight Ultra | Rausch mC range |
|---|---|---|
| Published pipe range | DN50–DN300 | mC50 starts from 40 mm; mC80 from 70 mm; mC360 family from around 70/80 mm depending on configuration |
| Push length | 60 m or 100 m Verisight Ultra coilers | mC50/Duo: up to 60 m; mC80: 130 m; mC360: 60 m |
| Camera options | AC40 HD axial and PTP50 HD pan-and-tilt compatible | 29 / 55 mm axial cameras across mC50/mC80; SK50 pan-and-tilt on mC360 |
| Reporting / connectivity | Wi-Fi, VisionReportApp and WinCan Web connectivity | Rausch recording/data workflow varies by selected display and system |
| Pan-and-tilt | PTP50 HD option | Dedicated mC360 Compact (40 m) and mC360 (60 m) systems |
Where Rausch has the advantage
- Starts smaller: mC50 is published from 40 mm.
- Longer push option: mC80 reaches 130 m versus Verisight Ultra's published 100 m maximum coiler.
- Dedicated pan-and-tilt choice: mC360 Compact and mC360 let you choose the format around the job.
- Broad Rausch push family: the same supplier covers minCord, axial mC, pan-and-tilt mC360 and Omicron Push & Drive.
Which should you choose?
If WinCan Web connectivity and iPEK's wireless reporting workflow are central, Verisight Ultra is strong. If you want smaller starting diameters, a 130 m push option and a wider dedicated Rausch push-camera family, Rausch is the stronger fit.
Sources: iPEK Verisight Ultra and Rausch International manufacturer information, checked August 2026. iPEK currently also lists AGILIOS configurations; this page compares the currently promoted Verisight Ultra platform. Exact capability depends on configuration.