Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c vs Rausch mC: the simple push-camera comparison.
The closest Rausch route is the mC push-system family, from mC30/mC50 through mC80 and mC360.

Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c vs Rausch mC: side by side
| Feature | Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c | Rausch mC range |
|---|---|---|
| Current published positioning | Pearpoint's UK page positions P540c for 4–12 in pipe inspection | mC30 / mC50 start from 40 mm; other mC systems scale upward by application |
| Controller | 10.1 in HD TFT, intuitive dedicated controls | 7 in / 8 in sunlight-readable displays depending on system |
| Recording / reporting | 128 GB storage, more than 90 hours of video, custom reporting and connected features | Digital image/video recording; workflow depends on the selected Rausch display/system |
| Long-distance push | Configuration-dependent | mC80: 130 m flexible push cable |
| Pan-and-tilt route | Depends on selected Pearpoint camera configuration | Dedicated mC360 Compact and mC360 systems with SK50 pan-and-tilt camera |
Where Rausch has the advantage
- Smaller-pipe hardware route: mC30/mC50 start from 40 mm.
- 130 m option: mC80 is designed specifically for long push distances.
- Dedicated pan-and-tilt systems: mC360 Compact and mC360 give a clear upgrade path.
- Choice by application: Rausch separates compact, dual-camera, long-distance and pan-and-tilt requirements into purpose-built systems.
Which should you choose?
If field reporting and the P540c controller experience are the deciding factors, Pearpoint is a strong option. If you need broader push-camera hardware choices from 40 mm through 130 m runs and dedicated pan-and-tilt inspection, Rausch is the stronger fit.
Sources: Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c and Rausch International mC manufacturer information, checked August 2026. Exact capability depends on configuration. Pearpoint and flexiprobe trademarks belong to their respective owners.