Rausch UK equipment comparisons

Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c vs Rausch mC | Push Camera Comparison

Manufacturer-source checked technical comparison • specifications rechecked October 2026

Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c vs Rausch mC: the simple push-camera comparison.

The closest Rausch route is the mC push-system family, from mC30/mC50 through mC80 and mC360.

Rausch mC30 push camera reel
Rausch mC30 — compact push-camera inspection from 40 mm.
Quick answer: Pearpoint P540c places more emphasis on its controller and field-reporting workflow. Rausch mC offers a broader hardware route, with systems starting from 40 mm, a published 130 m long-distance option and dedicated mC360 pan-and-tilt configurations.

Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c vs Rausch mC: side by side

Feature Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c Rausch mC range
Current published positioning Pearpoint's current page positions P540c for 4–12 in pipe inspection (about 102–305 mm) mC30 / mC50 Duo start from 40 mm; other mC systems scale upward by application
Controller 10.1 in HD TFT, intuitive dedicated controls 7 in / 8 in sunlight-readable displays depending on system
Recording / reporting On-board storage with custom reporting and connected sharing features Digital image/video recording; workflow depends on the selected Rausch display/system
Long-distance push Configuration-dependent mC80: 130 m flexible push cable
Pan-and-tilt route Depends on selected Pearpoint camera configuration Dedicated mC360 Compact and mC360 systems with SK50 pan-and-tilt camera

What matters in practice

Field reporting matters where crews are expected to finish and issue reports on site. If that is not a core requirement, minimum pipe access, useful push distance, camera choice, pan-and-tilt capability and service support may have more impact on the work the system can actually complete.

Where Rausch fits best

  • Smaller-pipe hardware route: mC30/mC50 Duo start from 40 mm.
  • 130 m option: mC80 is designed specifically for long push distances.
  • Dedicated pan-and-tilt systems: mC360 Compact and mC360 give a clear upgrade path.
  • Choice by application: Rausch separates compact, dual-camera, long-distance and pan-and-tilt requirements into purpose-built systems.

Which system suits which work?

If integrated field reporting is a core requirement, compare the P540c workflow directly. If you need a substantially smaller 40 mm entry route, a dedicated 130 m long-distance system and separate pan-and-tilt configurations, Rausch is the broader hardware fit.

See Rausch push systems →

Sources: Pearpoint flexiprobe P540c and Rausch International mC manufacturer information, rechecked October 2026. Exact capability depends on configuration. Pearpoint and flexiprobe trademarks belong to their respective owners.